This workpackage is concerned with improving our metrological characterisation of measurements of GAIA-CLIM target Essential Climate Variables (ECVs). To enable a comprehensive comparison between a satellite and non-satellite measurement requires a full metrological characterisation of at least one of the two measurements (reference-quality data). A full characterisation requires an unbroken chain of measurement processing to SI or accepted standards and a quantification of the uncertainty in each step. The workpackage shall:

  • Create, to the extent possible, fully traceable reference-quality measurements for a number of measurement techniques that are close to such maturity (Task 2.1).
  • Analyse existing comparisons and observations to provide more indicative uncertainties for observations from the remainder of the global observing system capabilities (Task 2.2).
  • Undertake metrological auditing and produce best practices documentation for improving instrument characterisation (Task 2.3).
Image

Figure: Example metrological characterisation of a radiosonde profile from Dirksen et al., 2014.

First traceability model diagrams can be found here.

Product Traceability and Uncertainty (PTU) documents can be found here.

G2.22 FTIR cell measurements carried out to characterize Instrument Line Shape have their own uncertainties

For the retrieval of information about the vertical distribution of target species from FTIR spectra, it is important to know the FTIR instrument line shape (ILS). Therefore, regular cell measurements are carried out to characterize the ILS of the FTIR spectrometers. However, these cell measurements have their own uncertainties since these are obtained using optimal estimation: an ILS retrieval comes along with an uncertainty and an averaging kernel. In particular the averaging kernel for an ILS retrieval is often not adequately considered (Hase, 2012).

G2.37 Need for more complete metrological characterisation of spectroscopic information

Molecular spectroscopy provides the primary link between radiance and atmospheric gas composition. Full knowledge of the spectroscopic properties of a measurement could, in theory, provide a route to formal traceability for that measurement. The exact nature of the influence of spectroscopic uncertainties on the derived ECV products will vary according to the spectral region being measured and the specific details of the measurement technique being employed – and a series of related gaps have been identified.

G2.36 Lack of traceable uncertainties in MWR measurements and retrievals

Ground-based microwave radiometers (MWR) provide continuous and unattended retrievals of atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles, as well as of vertically-integrated total column water vapour (TCWV) and cloud liquid water (TCLW). Despite the significant scientific advancements allowed by MWR observations over the last forty years, current operational MWR retrievals are still lacking a traceable uncertainty estimate.

G2.31 Incomplete metrological understanding of the different retrieval methods, information content, and random and systematic uncertainties of MAX-DOAS tropospheric ozone measurements

Retrieving tropospheric ozone from passive remote sensing observations is difficult because almost 90% of the total column ozone resides in the stratosphere. Pioneering studies have demonstrated that information on tropospheric ozone can be extracted using the so-called MAX-DOAS (Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) technique. The information content of such measurements, however, remains to be thoroughly explored.

G2.30 Metrologically incomplete uncertainty quantification for Pandora ozone measurements

Pandora is a relatively new UV-VIS instrument for measuring total ozone and also ozone profiles in a similar way as MAX-DOAS instruments. So far only a few studies exist which describe measurement uncertainties or measurement validation. As a relatively inexpensive and automated instrument, there is a strong potential that a network of Pandora instruments could have a substantial role in the satellite validation in the future. A metrologically rigorous uncertainty quantification for the Pandora instrument is therefore needed.

G2.27 Lack of understanding of random uncertainties, air mass factor calculations, and vertical averaging kernels in the total ozone column retrieved by UV-visible spectroscopy

The uncertainties in the ozone slant columns retrieved with DOAS data analysis fitting procedures are predominantly caused by instrumental imperfections and by issues introduced within the analysis routines. Such uncertainties are often random and therefore can be estimated statistically from, e.g., the least-squares fit procedure. However, the fitting uncertainties derived from such analysis typically result in unrealistically small uncertainties and can lead to an underestimate by up to a factor of two.

G2.26 Poorly understood uncertainty in ozone cross-sections used in the spectral fit for DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandora data analysis

The uncertainty in the ozone absorption cross-sections is one of the main systematic error sources in the remote sensing of atmospheric ozone using UV-visible spectroscopy techniques. It is a structured random effect in that even though the uncertainty can be considered as primarily a systematic error source, the actual error is dependent on atmospheric temperature which varies across the annual cycle and with synoptic conditions.

G2.24 Lack of calibrated in-situ vertical profiles of CH4, CO2 (and CO) for improving the accuracy of FTIR (partial) column measurements of CH4, CO2 (and CO)

This gap addresses the need for sustained calibration of the FTIR remote sensing data (essentially columns with some vertical information that enables to separate partial columns) for CO2, CH4 (and CO). This can be done by comparing the FTIR data with co-located or nearby in-situ soundings of the same species that are calibrated to community standards, in this case the WMO standards. At present, however, there is not enough capacity to provide such in-situ data.

G2.18 Better agreement needed on systematic and random components of the uncertainty in FTIR measurements and how to evaluate them

There is no clear agreement yet within the FTIR community on the distinction and characterisation of the random and systematic components of the uncertainty in FTIR measurements. As a consequence, no common approach is available on how to evaluate these components appropriately leading to a degree of heterogeneity in the global FTIR network.