Non-satellite instrument techniques involved
Pandora
Gap remedies
Detailed description

Pandora is a relatively new UV-VIS instrument for measuring total ozone and also ozone profiles in a similar way as MAX-DOAS instruments. The instrument is relatively small, inexpensive and automatic. The number of Pandora instruments has been growing during recent years and therefore it is possible that a network of Pandoras could have stronger role in satellite validation in the future. For example, the European Space Agency has recently supported the development of Pandora network called Pandonia.

However, so far only a few studies exist which describe measurement uncertainties or measurement validation (see e.g. Herman et al. 2015, Tzortziou et al, 2012). This yields low confidence that the measurement uncertainties are currently either fully documented or rigorously quantified. For example, systematic uncertainty in Pandora direct-sun measurements are limited by temperature effects not corrected in current operational procedures. The neglect of temperature effects (related to the ozone spectroscopy in the Huggins bands) leads to seasonally dependent systematic biases and synoptic scale biases, of various amplitudes depending on the latitude of the site. This gap is partially addressed within GAIA-CLIM.

Operational space missions or space instruments impacted
Copernicus Sentinel 4/5
MetOp
MetOp-SG
Polar orbiters
Geostationary satellites
UV/VIS nadir
Passive sensors
Validation aspects addressed
Geophysical product (Level 2 product)
Gridded product (Level 3)
Assimilated product (Level 4)
Time series and trends
Gap status after GAIA-CLIM
After GAIA-CLIM this gap remains unaddressed

A literature review has been initiated on the uncertainties related to total ozone retrievals using the Pandora instrument. Based on this and additional information obtained during the CINDI-2 campaign, an analysis of selected types of uncertainties is currently being completed. We expect, in particular, that the outcomes of the CINDI-2 campaign held in September 2016 will provide additional input for this gap. Several Pandora instruments as well as MAX-DOAS instruments have participated in the campaign. Exercises and studies performed during this campaign will provide the community with relevant datasets and information about how to proceed most effectively.

Dependencies

There are similarities in filling this gap and G2.31 is related to MAX-DOAS instruments even though there are no critical dependencies.

References
  • Herman, J. R., Evans, R. D., Cede, A., Abuhassan, N. K., Petropavlovskikh, I., and McConville, G.: Comparison of Ozone Retrievals from the Pandora Spectrometer System and Dobson Spectrophotometer in Boulder Colorado, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3407–3418, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3407-2015, 2015.
  • Tzortziou, M., Herman, J. R., Cede, A., and Abuhassan, N.: High precision, absolute total column ozone measurements from the Pandora spectrometer system: Comparisons with data from a Brewer double monochromator and Aura OMI, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16303, doi:10.1029/2012JD017814, 2012.

Pandora is a relatively new UV-VIS instrument for measuring total ozone and also ozone profiles in a similar way as MAX-DOAS instruments. So far only a few studies exist which describe measurement uncertainties or measurement validation. As a relatively inexpensive and automated instrument, there is a strong potential that a network of Pandora instruments could have a substantial role in the satellite validation in the future. A metrologically rigorous uncertainty quantification for the Pandora instrument is therefore needed.