G2.24 Lack of calibrated in-situ vertical profiles of CH4, CO2 (and CO) for improving the accuracy of FTIR (partial) column measurements of CH4, CO2 (and CO)

Gap abstract: 

This gap addresses the need for sustained calibration of the FTIR remote sensing data (essentially columns with some vertical information that enables to separate partial columns) for CO2, CH4 (and CO). This can be done by comparing the FTIR data with co-located or nearby in-situ soundings of the same species that are calibrated to community standards, in this case the WMO standards. At present, however, there is not enough capacity to provide such in-situ data.

This gap also addresses the need for a European infrastructure for vertical greenhouse gas profiling in the troposphere for CO2 and CH4 There is a need for vertical profile information about these ECVs in the troposphere, among others, to verify model results, and to validate remote sensing total and partial column data. The capabilities of the ground-based remote-sensing observing systems are limited when it comes to vertical-profile information, and are not sufficiently validated. Options for filling this gap are the facilitation of access to airborne in-situ measurement systems, like aircraft or UAV, or Aircore for greenhouse gases.

Part I Gap description

Primary gap type: 
  • Knowledge of uncertainty budget and calibration
Secondary gap type: 
  • Spatiotemporal coverage
  • Vertical domain and/or vertical resolution
  • Technical (missing tools, formats etc.)
ECVs impacted: 
  • Carbon Dioxide
  • Methane
User category/Application area impacted: 
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) and Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS), operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • International (collaborative) frameworks and bodies (space agencies, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • Climate research (research groups working on development, validation and improvement of ECV Climate Data Records)
Non-satellite instrument techniques involved: 
  • FTIR
Detailed description: 

For the ECVs temperature, ozone, water vapour and aerosol, vertical-profile information with relatively high vertical resolution (100m to a few km) in the troposphere is available from sonde and/or lidar measurements. For greenhouse gases (CO, CH4, CO2), the non-satellite observing system does not have sufficient capabilities. The FTIR measurements of these greenhouse gases have a low vertical resolution of the order of 5 to 8 km, if any, and this vertical information is difficult to validate. For example, measurements analysed so far within the GAIA-CLIM project have shown that the CH4 retrieval can be improved under polar vortex conditions as a result of applying new profile data. Also, the modelling component in GAIA-CLIM has highlighted the deficiencies of the FTIR vertical profile information and the resulting needs for better in-situ vertical profiles.

One option to obtain in-situ vertical profiles is the use of the Aircore technique. This technique has been under development since 2000 and has the capability to obtain vertical profiles up to the middle stratosphere. Several Aircore sites exist in Europe, but the system is not yet a fully operational system. It is necessary to make the Aircore measurements easier for the users. Moreover, the Aircore cannot be launched at all sites, due to air traffic limitations and the fact that the Aircore must be recovered upon landing. The landing site cannot be pre-determined as long as the Aircore is launched with a balloon and descends with a simple parachute, thereby drifting with the wind and landing at a location which is not always suitable for retrieving the payload for performing the post-flight analysis of the air sample.

To solve the latter issue, some projects have investigated the design of a steered system to bring the Aircore down. A second option to obtain in-situ vertical profiles of greenhouse gases is to make use of aircraft spiral flights. The aircraft capacity in Europe is too limited to perform regular aircraft campaigns. Europe has no capability similar to the HIPPO campaigns in the USA. In any case, aircraft campaigns cannot cover vertical profiles higher than 12 km (a better calibration is possible if the profiles cover an altitude range from the ground up to the middle stratosphere), are very expensive, and are also difficult to organise above remote locations that are not situated on the European continent. High-altitude UAV or Aircore are required to cover higher altitudes. At present, high-altitude UAV are still largely in proof-of-concept stage.

However, although expensive, in-situ calibration of CH4, CO2 (and CO) columns/profiles measured by FTIR remote sensing instruments can be performed by aircraft overpasses equipped with in-situ instruments that are calibrated relative to the WMO standards. Such campaigns have been undertaken in the past, for example in Europe as part of the EU project IMECC. But, as mentioned above, new flight campaigns in Europe are currently not planned, the flights cover only an altitude up to about 12 km, and calibration flights are very costly and difficult over stations that are not situated in the European continent, like islands, S. America, Africa, Asia. Hence more regular verification of the calibration of the instruments is desirable, to ensure long-term and network-wide consistency with the standards, as well as to ensure a better understanding and minimization of the biases across the networks when studying fluxes from e.g. hot spot regions.

Operational space missions or space instruments impacted: 
  • Other, please specify:

Current and future satellite missions, which have the capability to measure greenhouse gases from space include GOSAT, IASI, OCO-2, Tansat, S5P, GOSAT-2, Merlin, MicroCarb, OCO-3, Sentinel-5.

Validation aspects addressed: 
  • Geophysical product (Level 2 product)
Gap status after GAIA-CLIM: 
  • After GAIA-CLIM this gap remains unaddressed

New Aircore in-situ vertical profile data will be made available outside of GAIA-CLIM that can serve as calibration of FTIR greenhouse gas measurements and in support of modelling activities. However, they are limited to only one site (Sodankyla) and with limited temporal coverage.

Part II Benefits to resolution and risks to non-resolution

Identified benefitUser category/Application area benefittedProbability of benefit being realisedImpacts
Increased accuracy of the measurements by ground-based network for validation/calibration purposes
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • High
Increases confidence in space borne measurements
Increased intra-network and inter-network (e.g., TCCON with ICOS) consistency
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • Climate research (research groups working on development, validation and improvement of ECV Climate Data Records)
  • High
Use of all network data without inconsistencies will increase the number of reliable data available for applications like flux inversions
Improved retrieval algorithms to be used by the sites
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus services C3S & CAMS, operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • High
Retrieval algorithms will be improved, leading to better precision and accuracy of the measurements
Identified riskUser category/Application area at riskProbability of risk being realisedImpacts
Inconsistencies in the network of FTIR data for the validation of satellite data
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • Medium
Reliable global validation of GHG satellites is at risk
Lack of traceability of remote sensing data leading to possible inconsistencies between remote sensing data and in-situ data due to erroneous or no calibration of remote sensing data
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus services C3S & CAMS, operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • High
Possible benefits of synergic exploitation of in-situ and remote sensing data are lost; the ICOS internal consistency is at risk
Significant uncertainties about vertical distribution of GHG in the troposphere
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • High
Absence of data for verification/validation of models and satellite data, and of FTIR retrievals of vertical profile information of GHG

Part III Gap remedies

Gap remedies: 

Remedy 1: Operationalise the Aircore technique at a range of sites also measuring using FTIR

Primary gap remedy type: 
Technical
Secondary gap remedy type: 
Deployment
Technical remedy: 
TRL 7 for the AirCore, TRL 5 for the steerable carrier
Proposed remedy description: 

Currently, there is a limited availability of Aircore in Europe: only a few institutes have the required expertise to build and operate them, and to analyse the data. Moreover, the deployment of an Aircore depends on the availability of a suitable balloon launching site.

To enable operational use of the Aircore for providing vertical profiles of greenhouse gases over Europe and elsewhere on a regular basis, we need to have an Aircore system that is available ‘off-the-shelf’ and that can be used at many sites by non-expert users. Or we need a dedicated provider of Aircore data in Europe.

Moreover, we need an Aircore system that can be launched at many more sites, without meeting too many constraints about the site’s environment. More specifically, we need an Aircore system that can descend in a steered way to a pre-determined landing site, and that complies with air traffic regulations. Currently, carrier platforms are being studied for bringing the Aircore down to a pre-defined landing spot, based on the concept of a steerable glider or Unmanned Airborne Vehicle (UAV). The development of this kind of system should be further extended and such systems should become readily available to the community.

Relevance: 

The database of vertical profiles of greenhouse gases measured by Aircore will be used by the scientific community for verification and validation purposes, and for better calibration of the non-satellite and satellite remote sensing observing system to WMO standards (traceability). In the end, it will result in more reliable greenhouse gases products and trends, e.g., in Copernicus.

The remedy will also contribute to the network-wide, more cost-effective calibration tool.

Measurable outcome of success: 

A much larger database of vertical profiles of greenhouse gases, with a better spatiotemporal spread.

Expected viability for the outcome of success: 
  • High
Scale of work: 
  • Consortium
  • Programmatic multi-year, multi-institution activity
Time bound to remedy: 
  • Less than 3 years
Indicative cost estimate (investment): 
  • Medium cost (< 5 million)
Potential actors: 
  • EU H2020 funding
  • Copernicus funding
  • WMO
  • ESA, EUMETSAT or other space agency
  • Academia, individual research institutes
  • SMEs/industry

Remedy 2: Enhance the airborne infrastructure in Europe.

Primary gap remedy type: 
Deployment
Secondary gap remedy type: 
Technical
Proposed remedy description: 

Currently there is a limited availability of suitable aircraft in Europe that can carry in-situ analysers of greenhouse gases to high altitude and make spiral flights to obtain vertical profiles. High-altitude UAV are still under development, but at the proof-of-concept phase and may have air traffic control restrictions that prove prohibitive.

We need an infrastructure and associated deployment programme that makes regular flights, especially over Europe but also over observation sites in other continents and the oceans, to obtain a good spatiotemporal sampling of the vertical distribution of greenhouse gases. This infrastructure can consist of aircrafts and/or UAV that can reach to high altitude. The scientific community should have easy access to this infrastructure for dedicated campaigns.

One option to realise this infrastructure is to engage more commercial airlines in the IAGOS RI such as to obtain a better spatiotemporal coverage of the profiles that are measured during take-off and landing of the aircrafts at the airports. Unfortunately, airports may not be representative for the background vertical profiles.

Relevance: 

Such an aircraft / UAV fleet will be very useful also for other research purposes (e.g., T/ H2O observations in the UTLS).

Measurable outcome of success: 
  1. A much larger database of vertical profiles of greenhouse gases, with a better spatiotemporal spread. It will be used by the scientific community for verification and validation purposes, and for better calibration of the non-satellite and satellite remote sensing observing system to WMO standards (traceability). In the end, it will result in more reliable greenhouse gases products and trends, e.g., in Copernicus.
  2. Better competitiveness with the US airborne capabilities
Expected viability for the outcome of success: 
  • High
Scale of work: 
  • Programmatic multi-year, multi-institution activity
Time bound to remedy: 
  • Less than 10 years
Indicative cost estimate (investment): 
  • High cost (> 5 million)
Potential actors: 
  • EU H2020 funding
  • Copernicus funding
  • ESA, EUMETSAT or other space agency

Remedy 3: Create a database of in-situ vertical profiles of CO2, CH4, and CO with sufficient spatiotemporal coverage, possibly as part of the ICOS RI.

Primary gap remedy type: 
Deployment
Secondary gap remedy type: 
Governance
Proposed remedy description: 

To enable a regular and network-wide calibration of remote sensing measurements (ground-based FTIR), the community needs access to a database of in-situ vertical profiles from regular airborne observations at different locations in Europe and beyond – in which the in-situ observations are calibrated against a commonly adopted standard (e.g., the WMO standard). This requires a sufficient capacity of well-calibrated airborne sensors and sufficient spiral flight opportunities close to the ground-based FTIR observatories (see remedies 1 and 2) from which to constitute such a database. In fact, this capacity should be part of the ICOS Research Infrastructure, to make it sustainable and fulfil the specific needs of the ICOS and ICOS-user communities. Hence, the proposed remedy is to create a database of in-situ vertical profiles of CO2, CH4 and CO with sufficient spatiotemporal coverage to calibrate FTIR profile information.

Relevance: 

The remedy will contribute to the network-wide, more cost-effective calibration- making it consistent with the in-situ networks. This is very relevant for the ICOS RI and the Copernicus services (CAMS and C3S).

Measurable outcome of success: 

The availability of an increased number of calibrated, in-situ vertical profile data of greenhouse gases with good spatiotemporal coverage would contribute to the next, improved version of the FTIR retrievals and to a better assessment of the seasonal cycle. It will lower the biases between sites in the network, and improve the consistency with surface in-situ measurements of the greenhouse gases as carried out in ICOS.

Expected viability for the outcome of success: 
  • High
Scale of work: 
  • Consortium
Time bound to remedy: 
  • Less than 5 years
Indicative cost estimate (investment): 
  • Medium cost (< 5 million)
Potential actors: 
  • EU H2020 funding
  • Copernicus funding
  • National funding agencies
  • WMO
  • ESA, EUMETSAT or other space agency
  • Academia, individual research institutes
  • National measurement institutes