G4.10 Incomplete estimates of uncertainties in land surface infrared emissivity atlases

Gap abstract: 

Land surface emissivity atlases in the infrared region (3-17 μm) are required for the validation of infrared satellite sounding measurements over land. Work is underway, outside of the GAIA-CLIM project, to develop dynamic atlases of spectral emissivity in this part of the spectrum, based on measurements from polar-orbiting hyper-spectral infrared observations and using a rapidly updating Kalman Filter. However, these new dynamic atlases need to be validated to ensure the estimates have robust uncertainties associated with them.

Part I Gap description

Primary gap type: 
  • Knowledge of uncertainty budget and calibration
Secondary gap type: 
  • Parameter (missing auxiliary data etc.)
ECVs impacted: 
  • Temperature
  • Water vapour
User category/Application area impacted: 
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) and Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS), operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • Climate research (research groups working on development, validation and improvement of ECV Climate Data Records)
Non-satellite instrument techniques involved: 
  • Other non-GAIA-CLIM targeted instrument techniques, please specify:
  • G4.10 should be addressed with G4.01

    Argument: Gap 4.01 is concerned with the use of NWP fields for the validation of observations relating to temperature and humidity, This gap (G4.10) identifies one component of the challenge described in G4.01, and affects temperature and humidity sounding measurements in the boundary layer and lower troposphere over land.

    G4.08 and G4.09 can be addressed independently of G4.10

Detailed description: 

Passive-infrared observations from satellite radiometers operating in the spectral range from 17-3.3 µm are widely used to make remote-sensing measurements of the Earths atmosphere and surface characteristics. Vertical profiles of humidity and temperature and surface properties such as skin temperature are derived from measurements in this spectral region.  The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) spectral signals in this range can, depending on the state of the atmosphere, comprise a significant component due to emission and reflection from the land or ocean surface. It is therefore critical that validated models of (ocean and land) surface emissivity are available for the analysis of these infrared observations. This requirement, for validated models of emissivity, spans applications ranging from the assimilation of Level-1 products (for example) in reanalysis efforts, to the generation of Level-2 (and higher) products at all levels of maturity ranging from near-real-time operational products to climate data records.

There are particular challenges to representing the emissivity of land surfaces. In contrast to the ocean, where the physical mechanisms governing the surface emission can be parameterised, the infrared land surface emission is highly dependent on properties such as land-surface coverage (vegetation, bare soil, snow and so on), roughness and moisture content. These properties may change slowly (seasonally) or rapidly (daily). As a result, it has become necessary to rely on infrared land surface emissivity atlases, which characterize in a gridded fashion the global variations in emissivity at different frequencies.

There are several notable examples of publicly available atlases. The ASTER Global Emissivity Dataset has been compiled using cloud free scenes from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer on the Terra satellite. Monthly emissivity maps at 5 km spatial resolution are available for the years 2000-2015 (Hulley et al., 2015). Validation with laboratory spectra from four desert sites resulted in an absolute error of approximately 1%.

Capelle et al. (2012) applied a multispectral method for the retrieval of emissivity and surface temperature from IASI clear sky fields of view. They obtained a high spectral resolution product over the tropics for the period 2007-2011. The product was validated against emissivity spectra retrieved with an airborne interferometer (Thelen et al., 2009) to within an absolute accuracy of 2%.

Borbas et al. (2007) developed the UWIREMIS global land surface emissivity atlas for the 3.7 to 14.3 µm range. The atlas was derived by regressing the MODIS operational land surface emissivity product against laboratory emissivity spectra. At the Met Office, the UWIREMIS atlas is used as a first guess in the 1-D variational retrieval of surface emissivity for IASI observations over land.

The use of infrared emissivity atlases in NWP models is evolving. At the Met Office, work is underway to incorporate emissivity estimates derived from sounders such as IASI into a dynamically updated atlas (Gray, 2016). By using a Kalman filter approach, it is intended that the atlas can be updated in near-real-time as new observations become available. Thus, it would be able to capture short term emissivity variations in a way that static atlases cannot. This methodology is promising; however, such atlases need to be validated to make sure the retrieved values have robust uncertainties associated with them. 

 

Operational space missions or space instruments impacted: 
  • MetOp
  • MetOp-SG
  • Polar orbiters
  • Geostationary satellites
  • Infrared nadir
  • Passive sensors
  • Other, please specify:

AIRS on Aqua; CrIS on NOAA JPSS satellites; HIRAS, GIIRS on Chinese Feng-Yun series; IRS on future Meteosat Third Generation satellites

Validation aspects addressed: 
  • Radiance (Level 1 product)
  • Geophysical product (Level 2 product)
  • Gridded product (Level 3)
  • Auxiliary parameters (clouds, lightpath, surface albedo, emissivity)
Gap status after GAIA-CLIM: 
  • After GAIA-CLIM this gap remains unaddressed

Part II Benefits to resolution and risks to non-resolution

Identified benefitUser category/Application area benefittedProbability of benefit being realisedImpacts
Resolution of this gap will enable greater use of surface-sensitive satellite observations over land in NWP data assimilation systems (either by permitting the use of extra channels, or giving greater weight to existing observations).
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus services C3S & CAMS, operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • Medium
Potential improvements in ERA near-surface analyses; improved confidence in projected impacts.
Broader usability of ECV parameters
  • Climate research (research groups working on development, validation and improvement of ECV Climate Data Records)
  • Medium
Greater confidence in ECV parameters derived from passive infrared sensors, such as land surface radiation budget.
Identified riskUser category/Application area at riskProbability of risk being realisedImpacts
Sub-optimal validation of new EO data
  • International (collaboration) frameworks (SDGs, space agency, EU institutions, WMO programmes/frameworks etc.)
  • Climate research (research groups working on development, validation and improvement of ECV Climate Data Records)
  • High
Less confidence in findings based on observational data of unknown quality over land.
Sub-optimal (slower) evolution of the community’s understanding of the quality of key measured datasets
High uncertainties associated with surface emissivity modelling
  • Operational services and service development (meteorological services, environmental services, Copernicus services C3S & CAMS, operational data assimilation development, etc.)
  • Medium
The error component associated with surface emission modeling remains large and dominates the error budget for these observations, thereby limiting the weight given to these observations in climate reanalyses
- consequently limiting the accuracy of NWP and reanalysis based analyses of lower tropospheric humidity and temperature over land
This will have knock-on effects on attempts to predict regionally resolved impacts of climate change.

Part III Gap remedies

Gap remedies: 

Remedy 1: Provision of validated land surface infrared emissivity atlases

Primary gap remedy type: 
Technical
TRL4
Secondary gap remedy type: 
Deployment
Research
Proposed remedy description: 

There is a need to establish a comprehensive set of dynamic land surface infrared emissivity atlases. It is first required to perform an intercomparison of available emissivity models to ascertain their potential strengths and weaknesses and highlight where the greatest uncertainties exist. It is then necessary to coordinate airborne campaigns to validate land-emissivity models in the infrared-spectral region with a special focus on those domains where current models are most uncertain. The resulting improved infrared emissivity atlases should be made openly available in usable formats and broadly advertised. Peer-reviewed publications are likely to be required to build confidence in and raise awareness of these products. 

Relevance: 

There is a need to establish a comprehensive set of dynamic land surface infrared emissivity atlases. The resulting improved infrared emissivity atlases should be made openly available in usable formats and broadly advertised. 

Measurable outcome of success: 

Publicly available, open-source, dynamic (daily) spectral emissivity atlases in the infrared (3-17 μm). Documented, quantitative evaluation of infrared land surface emissivity atlases and models with respect to measurements of land-surface emissivity obtained during airborne campaigns, for a globally representative range of surfaces. 

Expected viability for the outcome of success: 
  • Medium
Scale of work: 
  • Consortium
Time bound to remedy: 
  • Less than 5 years
Indicative cost estimate (investment): 
  • Medium cost (< 5 million)
Indicative cost estimate (exploitation): 
  • No
Potential actors: 
  • National funding agencies
  • National Meteorological Services
  • ESA, EUMETSAT or other space agency
  • Academia, individual research institutes
References: 
  • Borbas E., Knuteson R.O., Seemann S.W., Weisz E., Moy L., Huang H-L. (2007). A high spectral resolution global land surface infrared emissivity database. Joint 2007 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference and 15th Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography Conference of the American Meteorological Society, 24–28 September.
  • Capelle, V., Chédin, A., Péquignot, E., Schlüssel, P., Newman, S. M. and Scott, N. A. (2012). Infrared continental surface emissivity spectra and skin temperature retrieved from IASI observations over the tropics. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 51, 1164-1179.
  • Gray, R. (2016). Development of a dynamic infrared land surface emissivity atlas from IASI retrievals. Eumetsat Fellowship First Year Report.
  • Hulley, G. C., Hook, S. J., Abbott, E., Malakar, N., Islam, T. and Abrams, M. (2015). The ASTER Global Emissivity Dataset (ASTER GED): Mapping Earth’s emissivity at 100 meter spatial scale. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7966–7976. doi:10.1002/2015GL065564
  • Thelen, J.-C., Havemann, S., Newman, S. M. and Taylor, J. P. (2009). Hyperspectral retrieval of land surface emissivities usingARIES. Quart. J., Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 2110–2124.